{Disarmed} Re: {Disarmed} Re: Newish domains scoring
Tracy Greggs via MailScanner <mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected]> Wed, 10 May 2023 21:14:33 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.virus.mailscanner |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks Peter, this would help. ------ Original Message ------ From "Peter Farrow via MailScanner" <mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected]> To "Tracy Greggs via MailScanner" <mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected]> Cc "Peter Farrow" <[email protected]> Date 5/10/2023 3:58:33 PM Subject {Disarmed} Re: Newish domains scoring >Try these: > >https://spameatingmonkey.com/services > >SEM-FRESH etc for domains registered recently. > >On 10/05/2023 21:51, Tracy Greggs via MailScanner wrote: >>I know this is a question for the SA users group but I wanted to throw >>it in here in the even anyone has any ideas or existing solutions. >> >>So, here we go. >> >>We almost never get any phishing email from domains over 1 year old. >> >>We get a lot of phishing email from domains less than 1 year old. >> >>I would love to be able to have an accurate way of scoring up email >>from domains less than fill in the blank days old. In my case 380 >>days. This way we could review them for validity and release them if >>they are good. >> >>An accurate way of performing this check would save us quite a bit of >>grief. >> >>Ideas or solutions to this anyone? >> >-- >Peter Farrow BEng(hons) BBC ETSI >Office: 01249 736180 | <tel:01249 736181> >Mobile: +44 (0) 7799605617 <tel:+44 (0) 7799605617> >Email:MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from >"mail:[email protected]" claiming to be >[email protected] <mail:[email protected]> >Website: www.togethia.it <https://www.togethia.it> ><https://facebook.com/togethiait> <skype:peter_farrow> -- MailScanner mailing list mailscanner-qhrM8SXbD5JTOyd/[email protected] http://lists.mailscanner.info/mailman/listinfo/mailscanner