Re: bbdbv3 and wanderlust

I investigated the issue.  The root cause seems that related functions
don't assume to be called from message buffer.  There are 2 actual
problems.

1. As you desribed, bbdb/wl-header assumes to be called from summary
buffer, but actually it may be called from message buffer too.  My
previous post should resolve it.

2. wl-message-redisplay-hook's functions are called from message
buffer.  When bbdb-mua-auto-update is called from message buffer,
bbdb-mua function is called from the same buffer via
bbdb-mua-update-records.  Because message buffer's major mode is
mime-view-mode, bbdb-mua signals error.  Here is minimal patch.
(Strictly, mime-view-mode is provided by SEMI and not specific to
Wanderlust.  But BBDB does not support other MUA which uses SEMI.)

diff --git a/lisp/bbdb-mua.el b/lisp/bbdb-mua.el
index 2f3378b..aab05ed 100644
--- a/lisp/bbdb-mua.el
+++ b/lisp/bbdb-mua.el
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
     (rmail rmail-mode rmail-summary-mode)
     (mh mhe-mode mhe-summary-mode mh-folder-mode)
     (mu4e mu4e-view-mode)  ; Tackle `mu4e-headers-mode' later
-    (wl wl-summary-mode wl-draft-mode)
+    (wl wl-summary-mode wl-draft-mode mime-view-mode)
     (message message-mode mu4e-compose-mode notmuch-message-mode)
     (mail mail-mode))
   "Alist of MUA modes supported by BBDB.


> > If you use sticky summary feature, summary buffer's name is not euqal
> > to wl-summary-buffer-name.  Replacing bbdb/wl-header function with the
> > below code should fix your problem.
> Do you mean the wl-summary-always-sticky-folder-list variable?

Yes.

--
Kazuhiro Ito