"open source"? or not?
Zoe <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jan 2005 01:49:04 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.zoe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Anyone has an opinion on this subject? This seems to have originate here: http://lemonodor.com/archives/001043.html#c7988 And there: http://www.haloscan.com/comments/taoofmac/blog_2005_01_13/#53346 Feedbacks greatly appreciated! :) Cheers, R. Begin forwarded message: > From: Kragen Sitaker <[email protected]> > Date: January 30, 2005 21:16:45 CET > To: [email protected] > Subject: Zoe is not open source > > In the Zoe FAQ, you claim that Zoe is open-source. But the license you > chose in December 2002 is a Creative Commons license that forbids > commercial redistribution, in conflict with the first provision of the > Open Source Definition: > http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php > > I am writing to you in hopes that you will correct the FAQ. I do not > yet see any evidence that this misstatement in the FAQ is anything > other > than an honest mistake; it would be easy for someone to think that all > of the Creative Commons licenses are open-source licenses. Of course, > as I am an enthusiast of free software, I would be delighted if you > made > the software open-source instead, particularly since I find Zoe's ideas > so inspiring, but I am sure you did not make your choice of license > lightly. Begin forwarded message: > From: Mike Linksvayer <[email protected]> > Date: January 31, 2005 01:14:50 CET > To: [email protected] > Subject: zoe license & creative commons > > Hi, I note that your FAQ > http://zoe.nu/itstories/story.php?data=stories&num=2&sec=1 says that > ZOE is open source and that it uses a Creative Commons > Attribution-NonCommercial license. > > FYI, the CC license you're using is not open source. To qualify as > open source a license must not discriminate by use > http://opensource.org/docs/definition.php#6 . > > Creative Commons recommends using an open source license for software, > see http://creativecommons.org/faq#faq_entry_3646 . > > You may wish to consider using an open source license for ZOE, but you > definitely should not call it open source if you continue to use the > CC by-nc license. > > Thanks, > Mike > > -- > Mike Linksvayer > http://creativecommons.org/about/people#21 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl