Re: "open source"? or not?
Zoe <[email protected]> Mon, 31 Jan 2005 02:56:49 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.mail.zoe.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jan 31, 2005, at 02:44, Steve Mallett wrote: > Sorry, it isn't. The opensource definition does not allow > discrimination against groups, in this case commercial users. > http://www.opensource.org/docs/definition.php This is according to the above "entity". Anyone is free to express their opinions, whatever they might be. After all, this is the "Internet" and no one knows you might be a dog. Personally, I'm not judgmental one way or another. Out of curiosity, who are you and what's your interest in ZOË? Also, what is your affiliation with Kragen Sitaker <[email protected]> of "CommerceNet" and Mike Linksvayer <[email protected]>? High-school chums perhaps? Cheers, R. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl