Re: TwentyTen - the return of the infamous cat#-discussion

So if i'm correct there'll be clashes if any cat# of this year has the same format as the particular cat# of 1993, right?

In that year we had the following formats:
B/AD 3001 - Single [belly]
CAD 3002 - Album [belly]
BAD 3003 - EP [uvs]
CAD 3004 - Album [f.black]
B/AD 3005 - Single [f.black]
cad 3006 - Album [hnia]
bad 3007 - EP [unrest]
dad 3008 - Double-album [rhp]
cad 3009 - Album [h.berry]
bad 3010 - EP [h.berry]
bad 3011 - EP [breeders]
cad 3012 - Album [unrest]
dad 3013 - Double-album [dcd]
cad 3014 - Album [breeders]
bad 3015 - EP [unrest]
cad 3016 - Album [rhp]
b/ad 3017 - Single [breeders]

Oddly the first anounced release of this year is already heading for a clash (Tindersticks' Falling Down a Mountain [CAD 3X02] vs. Belly's Star [CAD 3002]) ... or is it not?
It seems i still don't get it. Help!



--- In [email protected], "sweetfoolthemouth" <sweetfoolthemouth@...> wrote:
>
> --- In [email protected], <frankbri@> wrote:
> >
> > 2000 was '2K', why not make 2010 '3X', where 'X' stands for '10', so 3X = 30.
> > 
> > Frank 
> 
> It would certainly make a lot more sense that way!
> 
> Though there's still the issue with barcodes - which even though we're a year away, I might 
> have to bring up soon... 
> 
> Fun times!
>




------------------------------------