>What do you mean when you say "the fee was negligible"? Are you referring to the regular $75 >fee, or do you mean that the one-time cost of fighting an uninsured fire would have been >"negligible"?
No worries... Karl was trying to trap me. He's on your side, Peter.
> Why is this about money? The fee was negligible, and the homeowner > willing to reimburse. This is not about the money.
It is about money. All the defenses that have been brought up have been about money. And apparently, this guy and his family were just freeloading theives.
Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I have seen the future brother: It is murder."~Leonard Cohen
"We live as though the world were as it should be. To show it what it can be."~Angel, Deep Down
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.