Re: Firefighters did the Christian thing in letting house burn to the ground

The 75 bucks.  It was a pretty wimpy annual cost for fire protection.  I think
it was designed as a supplement and token fee, there is no way 75 annually pays
the salaries, costs and maintenance of a fire department.  The fee was
administrative.

So the fact that the guy says he was willing to pay is irrelevant.  It was not
about the money.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Peter T. Chattaway
Sent: Friday, October 08, 2010 9:34 AM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Firefighters did the Christian thing in letting house
burn to the ground

On Fri, 8 Oct 2010, Karl wrote:
> Why is this about money?  The fee was negligible, and the homeowner
> willing to reimburse.  This is not about the money.

What do you mean when you say "the fee was negligible"?  Are you referring
to the regular $75 fee, or do you mean that the one-time cost of fighting
an uninsured fire would have been "negligible"?

--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot



-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot