Are Europeans all Middle Easterners?
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
http://isteve.blogspot.com/2010/10/are-europeans-all-middle-easterners.html
by Steve Sailer
For quite a number of decades, it has been apparent that agriculture was
first invented in the "Fertile Crescent" of the Middle East, then spread
into Europe. But that raised the question of how agriculture spread: did
Middle Easterners colonize Europe or did existing European
hunter-gatherers pick up Middle Eastern techniques? A couple of decades or
so ago, geneticists entered this debate. L.L. Cavalli-Sforza argued that
most Europeans today are descended from Middle Eastern farmers. Bryan
Sykes responded that most Europeans are descended from indigenous
hunter-gatherers who switched to farming.
The latest view is that Cavalli-Sforza was even more right than he
claimed. Matthias Schultz writes in Der Spiegel in "How Middle Eastern
Milk Drinkers Conquered Europe:"
At around 5300 BC, everyone in Central Europe was suddenly farming and
raising livestock. The members of the Linear Pottery culture kept cows in
wooden pens, used rubbing stones and harvested grain. Within less than 300
years, the sedentary lifestyle had spread to the Paris basin.
The reasons behind the rapid shift have long been a mystery. Was it an
idea that spread through Central Europe at the time, or an entire people?
Peaceful Cooperation or Invasion?
Many academics felt that the latter was inconceivable. Agriculture was
invented in the Middle East, but many researchers found it hard to believe
that people from that part of the world would have embarked on an endless
march across the Bosporus and into the north.
Jens Luning, a German archaeologist who specializes in the prehistoric
period, was influential in establishing the conventional wisdom on the
developments, namely that a small group of immigrants inducted the
established inhabitants of Central Europe into sowing and milking with
"missionary zeal." The new knowledge was then quickly passed on to others.
This process continued at a swift pace, in a spirit of "peaceful
cooperation," according to Luning.
But now doubts are being raised on that explanation. New excavations
in Turkey, as well as genetic analyses of domestic animals and Stone Age
skeletons, paint a completely different picture:
* At around 7000 BC, a mass migration of farmers began from the
Middle East to Europe.
* These ancient farmers brought along domesticated cattle and
pigs.
* There was no interbreeding between the intruders and the
original population.
Mutated for Milk
The new settlers also had something of a miracle food at their
disposal. They produced fresh milk, which, as a result of a genetic
mutation, they were soon able to drink in large quantities. The result was
that the population of farmers grew and grew.
These striking insights come from biologists and chemists. In a
barrage of articles in professional journals like Nature and BMC
Evolutionary Biology, they have turned many of the prevailing views upside
down over the course of the last three years.
There's a good accompanying graphical map here.
Of course, all this raises even more questions, such as in regard to the
recently surmised Neanderthal introgression
Having seen opinion shift several times on this topic over the last decade
and a half, I look forward to future developments.
This lactose tolerant-centric view of the pre-history of Europe may
provide some posthumous vindication to Raymond D. Crotty, a failed Irish
dairy farmer turned economist, who emphasized the importance of the
mutation to facilitate dairy farming as crucial to the dense populating of
Northern Europe.
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot