Re: NPR fires Williams over Muslim fears » GetReligion

Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Its a sticky wicket to be sure.  I don't know that it violated the 1st 
amendment, although that argument was made.  But many private organizations are 
leery of taking govt. money because of the obligations it creates.  The become 
at least quasi government in doing so.   Its well settled law that once you take 
govt. funds you are subject to greater constitutional, as well as regulatory, 
scrutiny because of the connection to the government.  Catholic hospitals 
have wrestled with the issue of being able to refuse to perform 
abortions.  Contractors with the US govt. are inundated with regulations and 
requirements to abide by standards applied by and to the govt.  


Hillsdale College in MI is rather famous for being the only college in the 
country that refuses ALL fed money including financial aid and they have done 
that so they aren't bound by the restrictions, constitutional and otherwise 
places on institutions that take govt. funds.

Mike F.  

 



----- Original Message ----
From: Peter T. Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 12:27:17 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] NPR fires Williams over Muslim fears » GetReligion

On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Mike Findlay wrote:
> No.  Government funding makes you part of the government, it doesn't matter who 
>directed what.  Its the same principle that makes universities subject to higher 
>constitutional scrutiny than private colleges. 

So, um, did Dubya's funding of faith-based organizations violate the First 
Amendment?  Did those organizations become "part of the government"?

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.