RE: NPR fires Williams over Muslim fears ? GetReligion

> We must not pretend, for the sake of principle, that the next
> terrorist attack might come from a group of indignant Scandinavians or
> vengeful Navahoe. Our enemy isn't shy about their affiliations or
> motivations (which, just to reiterate, are explicitly religious and
> specifically Islamic).
>
> **a point that many want to ignore for sure.  This is where Juan's
> comment on
> political correctness was right on the money.

Sure, but the freedom to ignore political correctness doesn't grant
one the right to make ignorant statements.

**his statement was not ignorant.

> **in McVeigh's example, he also did not claim to have blown up the
> building
> because of any faith.  The fact that Muslims do so and claim they
> must do so in
> the name of their faith is very relevant.

But is the terrorists faith the same as the typical Muslim's faith?  I
submit it is significantly different.

**how?

> The Muslims we're fighting are part of a  well-funded,
> highly-organized, internationally cooperative network. Their
> sympathizers include powerful, influential politicians AND religious
> leaders. It's not a handful of crazies, my friends, it's a *movement,*
> and a growing one. We ignore these facts at our peril.
>
> **I think that trying to pin them down is a bit hard.  Pamela Geller
> will make
> hay about how the radical islam element *is* the mainstream, but I
> honestly
> wonder.
>
> **I think a certain percent just goes along with it for survival.

Probably.

**how do we tell the difference?  The fact is that a lot of muslims express
support. How do we pick out the ones who actually believe it?



-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot