Re: NPR fires Williams over Muslim fears » GetReligion

Nina Totenburg: the record is replete with examples.  



----- Original Message ----
From: Karl <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, October 22, 2010 4:44:16 PM
Subject: RE: [DADL-OT] NPR fires Williams over Muslim fears » GetReligion

On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Karl <[email protected]> wrote:
> NPR is publically funded

Barely.  I assume (and hope) the reason they recently changed their
name from "National Public Radio" to just plain old en-pee-arr is in
anticipation of losing that 2% of their budget.

**6-8% actually when you account for all the funds.

I'll cheer that day.
It'll be good for them.  And I'll still trust NPR more than Fox News.
(Which is to say, I'll continue to leave the room in shock and horror
when Fox News is on, and continue to listen to the Marketplace and
Radiolab podcasts.)


**Thyat's your choice.  Fox is not paid for by my taxes.  I can choose to
support them or not.  NPR sucks on the public Teat, then uses that to promote a
liberal bias.


> they have to pass a higher standard of fairness.

From my (limited) point of view, they have a higher standard than
anyone else in American radio or TV; than just about anyone other than
certain print journalists.


**only if you are liberal.  Liberals get away with anything they want.


A higher standard of fairness wouldn't
prevent them from firing Jaun Williams.  It might force them to
reprimand or fire their more outspoken liberal analysts who support
liberal pundits and make public proclamations of their personal views.


**fine, then let's see it happen.  Until then this is hypocritical and partisan.


Whether Williams was right or wrong (or right or left) has nothing to
do with his crossing the journalistic line created by NPR.  At any
rate, I'll shed no tears for Williams over trumped up "censorship"
charges, when he's reportedly just been hired by Fox for $2 million
and was clearly at no risk of going homeless.


**they took advantage of it and gave him a job, good for everyone.  But there is
still a principle at stake.


Find a specific example of a liberal NPR analyst going onto liberal
pundit show, and giving their personal opinions or speculations, and
we can debate or agree on whether they should also be fired (freeing
them up to be hired by some left wing media outlet that isn't beholden
to the same rules as NPR).  Unfortunately for journalism, most of the
money seems to be in punditry these days.  (Fortunately for
journalism, it isn't nearly as capital intensive an enterprise to
embark upon anymore.)


**as I said, I object to tax money funding a liberal bias.



-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot