Re: U.S. Seeks to Shield Goldman Secrets

Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
House still wins.

Mike F. 



----- Original Message ----
From: Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, October 27, 2010 10:13:59 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] U.S. Seeks to Shield Goldman Secrets


On Oct 27, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Lance McLain wrote:
> The arrest of the Goldman programmer helped put high-frequency trading into the 
>spotlight last year. The strategy, in which powerful computers buy and sell 
>securities at ultrafast speeds, has proved lucrative for many traders.
> 
> The indictment said Goldman's high-frequency trading operation generated "many 
>millions of dollars in profits per year."
> 
> The strategy also has come under heightened scrutiny amid concerns that some 
>high-frequency traders were gaining unfair advantages in the market. The 
>Securities and Exchange Commission has launched an in-depth study of issues 
>surrounding high-speed trading and is considering several proposals to monitor 
>it.

This is how Goldman has had entire quarters without a single day of trading 
losses.  That is statistically impossible if this market were fair.  They have 
faster co-located computers, API's directly into the exchanges trading systems, 
insider information as market makers and an SEC that looks the other way at 
their quote-stuffing and front running computers.  The latest estimates are that 
70% of all trades on the NYSE are held for less than 11 seconds!

Don't buy stocks.  Go to vegas.  Your odds are better.

regards,
-Lance


--dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot


-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.