Re: Okay...
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The harm caused by the punch often reveals the intent behind the punch. So bloodying a nose and knocking someone out cold could legitimately result in different charges. I'm also not talking about sentencing considerations. Different factors are and should be taken into account at that point. As I'm typing these I realize they made sound like distinctions without a difference but I don't believe they are. Mike F. ________________________________ From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, October 28, 2010 9:02:29 AM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Okay... >There are no exceptions. You should be charged only with the crime their is >probably cause to >believe you committed and convicted only of the crime their >is proof beyond a reasonable doubt >to believe you committed. > >Charging crimes based on who a person is is madness and fascist. So, you do not think there is a difference between an out of shape guy like me punching someone in the face and MAYBE giving them a bloody nose and a soldier striking someone in the face and knocking them unconcious? Although, i suppose it is the end result that determines what the crime is. Thom http://thomwade.wordpress.com/ http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade http://www.in-one-ear.com _______________________________________ "I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen= -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot