Re: Poll: Democrats split over whether Obama deserves challenge for his party's 2012 nomination

"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, [email protected] wrote:

> > Hmmm, and in all three cases, the incumbent president ended up winning 
> > his party's nomination but losing the election to the other party.
>
> It's worth noting Obama's approval is slightly higher than Reagan or 
> Clinton at this point in their first terms.

Well, Clinton never had a solid majority -- both of his victories were due 
to a split vote between Bush or Dole on the one hand and Perot on the 
other hand -- so *that's* not too surprising.

Reagan, though, is certainly interesting.  Especially given that he won 
re-election with the largest majority *ever* just two years later.

(And who did he defeat in '84?  The guy who ran for the vice-presidency in 
'80.  That's not a good exactly precedent for Palin, is it? :) )

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.