Re: Poll: Democrats split over whether Obama deserves challenge for his party's 2012 nomination
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 31 Oct 2010, [email protected] wrote: > > Hmmm, and in all three cases, the incumbent president ended up winning > > his party's nomination but losing the election to the other party. > > It's worth noting Obama's approval is slightly higher than Reagan or > Clinton at this point in their first terms. Well, Clinton never had a solid majority -- both of his victories were due to a split vote between Bush or Dole on the one hand and Perot on the other hand -- so *that's* not too surprising. Reagan, though, is certainly interesting. Especially given that he won re-election with the largest majority *ever* just two years later. (And who did he defeat in '84? The guy who ran for the vice-presidency in '80. That's not a good exactly precedent for Palin, is it? :) ) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot