Re: Apparently, he did not get the Memo...

But how do you do that?  Are you talking about outlawing them?

Mike F. 




________________________________
From: Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, November 4, 2010 12:20:58 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Apparently, he did not get the Memo...

I'm not saying do away with associations and alignments...I'm saying do away 
with official party affiliations in government. 


regards,
-Lance



On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:18 PM, Mike Findlay wrote:

Not to mention the 1st amendment.  I don't like the parties but there's that 
freedom of speech, association thing....
>
>
>
>
________________________________
From: Karl <[email protected]>
>To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
>Sent: Thu, November 4, 2010 12:13:47 PM
>Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Apparently, he did not get the Memo...
>
>
>How on earth can you not have people aligning by ideology?
> 
>I mean, I get what you are saying, but in a practical sense, how can you ever 
>mange it?
> 
>From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf 
>Of Lance McLain
>Sent: Thursday, November 04, 2010 9:28 AM
>To: DADL (off topic)
>Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Apparently, he did not get the Memo...
> 
>I think it is time to do away with political parties.  They are the cause of so 
>much of what is wrong with our political system...the catalyst to the money and 
>financing corruption so prevalent in government.  I think George Washington was 
>correct:
> 
>“The common and continual mischiefs of the spirit of party are sufficient to 
>make it the interest of a wise people to discourage and restrain it.  It serves 
>always to distract the public counsels and enfeeble the public administration.  
>It agitates the community with ill founded jealousies and false alarms; kindles 
>the animosity of one part against another, foments occasional riot and 
>insurrection.  It opens the door to foreign influence and corruption, which find 
>a facilitated access to the government itself through the channels of party 
>passions.”
> 
>regards,
>-Lance
> 
> 
>On Nov 4, 2010, at 10:14 AM, Johne Cook wrote:
>
>
>
>Huh. I didn't vote against any EHA. 
>
>I voted against a party that was so arrogant and corrupt that they signed 
>contracts forcing the new Republican administration to honor contracts totaling 
>$810 million for a high speed rail line the state's denizens don't want. It's 
>like selling a house and then after signing the papers, leaving the new 
>homeowners on the hook for a new roof, garage, and windows. It's dirty pool at 
>its best.
>http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/106488923.html
>
>Johne Cook
>| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |
>
>
>On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 9:41 AM, <[email protected]> wrote:
>Tony Perkins of the Family Research Council that is.  He apparently doesn't see 
>the Republican Victory as merely a reaction to out of control spending.  He 
>thinks the Tea Party and other Americans who voted Republican were sending this 
>message:
>http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/frc-even-after-voters-reject-his-agenda-president-obama-still-doesnt-get-it-106635993.html
>
> 
>"Last night millions of Americans went to the polls to express their strong 
>disagreement with the change President Obama has brought to Washington . Out of 
>control spending, government takeovers of health care and other private 
>enterprise and an allegiance to a pro-abortion/anti-family coalition are all 
>issues the American people said 'Enough!' to last night.
> 
>"When it comes to the homosexual agenda, the American people could not be 
>clearer. The flipping of at least six state legislatures, the defeat of three 
>justices in Iowa who imposed same-sex 'marriage' and the defeat of the House 
>Member leading the charge to overturn the current military policy are all 
>examples of how the American people have grown tired of the Democratic Party's 
>adherence to an anti-family coalition.
> 
>"I agree with the President that Congress should wait for the coming report from 
>the military on changing the current policy. However, that does not mean 
>Congress should rubber stamp any study. The study itself is likely to have 
>problems, and the next natural step would be to have the new 112th Congress hold 
>hearings on the issue.
> 
>"The arrogance of the President and his allies in Congress, many of whom will 
>not return in the new Congress, to force such a drastic change on our military 
>in the middle of fighting two wars is disrespectful of our troops, and should 
>not be tolerated."
>--------------
>Out of control spending was a part of it...but it was really a statement against 
>the Evil Homosexual Agenda.
>Thom
>http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
>http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
>http://www.in-one-ear.com
>_______________________________________
>"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen
>
>
>--
>dadl-ot mailing list
>http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>
>-- 
>dadl-ot mailing list
>http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
> -- 
>dadl-ot mailing list
>http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot