Did the Republican House landslide kill net neutrality?

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/11/net-neutrality-any-hope-left.ars

Did the Republican House landslide kill net neutrality?
By Matthew Lasar

The Federal Communications Commission has published the agenda for its
November Open Meeting. It comes two days after the Democrats took
their shellacking in the midterm Congressional elections. And once
again, the FCC's Open Internet proposals are nowhere to be found on
the list of action items.

Why not? Here's one idea: Net neutrality foes point out that none of
the nearly one hundred Democratic candidates who signed a pledge to
support the policy won their race.

"The FCC should take note that the main 'political' driver behind
trying to make net neutrality into a national grass roots issue,
FreePress/PCCC/Moveon.org, could not get the issue to register on the
election radar screen," observed Scott Cleland on Wednesday, "and
where ever they did attract a candidate endorsement of their position,
they failed 100 percent [of] the time in having that candidate get
elected."

No doubt that the concept was buried under a pile of front-burner
concerns—the economy, health care, and immigration the biggest among
them. All the more reason to wonder whether this election can be
construed as a national plebiscite on net neutrality. When do telecom
issues ever get that far?

It is certainly true, however, that the House is now packed with
headline-hungry politicians ready to pounce on the double n-word at a
moment's notice. They squelched Henry Waxman's (D-CA) modest
compromise proposal in a matter of days. That's got to be giving the
FCC's boss Julius Genachowski a jitter or two.

Last week's theories

We've heard all kinds of theories about why the Commission didn't
pursue its open Internet proposals prior to Tuesday. The big one was
that White House economist Larry Summers and Chief of Staff Rahm
Emanuel put pressure on the agency to keep the issue on a low flame.
But they've moved on, and can't be blamed for the delay any longer.

Another popular thesis was that Genachowski just doesn't want to "man
up" to the pushback he's been getting from the phone and cable
industries on the question. We do telecom rather than testosterone
analysis around here, so we'll pass on that observation.

In any event, if the FCC's boss actually wants to do something about
net neutrality, he still can. He's got three votes. The FCC could
launch its proposal to partially reclassify ISPs as common carriers.
Or it could propose something like the Google/Verizon plan—a far
weaker enforcement scheme with its exemptions for wireless broadband.
Or it could cook up something in between these scenarios.

As for all the political fallout that will come with any action—here's
an idea. Why not wait and see how hard the Republican House tries to
defund the Obama administration's health care bill? If Washington,
D.C. shuts down in the ensuing stalemate, and electricity around
Capitol Hill goes out, who'll notice if the FCC issues a net
neutrality order via candlelight and batteries?

Just a thought. Never mind.

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot