Re: The White House Needs Elizabeth Warren, Now More Than Ever

On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, [email protected] wrote:
> Wait...I realized the exception...if you are not a Christian?  Higher 
> standard does not apply.  In the argument over gay rights in general? 
> It is pretty fair to say most opposing gay rights tend to cite a 
> religious basis behind their opposition.

Or they make arguments about "natural law" claiming that the argument is 
non-religious... and yet everyone who makes these arguments happens to 
*be* religious.  (Remember that debate I referred to in the "sigh." 
thread?  Certain people -- including a good friend of mine -- didn't take 
kindly to my suggestion that "natural law" is (or has become) another 
buzzword like "family values" or "intelligent design".  It's one of those 
stealth terms that everyone sees through ... like in those movies when 
someone tries to hide by holding a bush in front of them while they 
tiptoe, and everyone else can see the tiptoeing bush.)

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot