Re: natural law (was: The White House Needs Elizabeth Warren, Now More Than Ever)

On Nov 5, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Peter T. Chattaway wrote:

> On Fri, 5 Nov 2010, Lance McLain wrote:
>
>>> Well, not that I consider Wikipedia authoritative or anything, but  
>>> they indicate that there are multiple kinds of "natural law" out  
>>> there -- which immediately tells you that invoking "natural law",  
>>> full stop, doesn't necessarily get us anywhere.
>>
>> Yeah...my interpretation is driven almost exclusively by Lysander  
>> Spooner's excellent essay on the subject.
>
> So does he say anything that would have any bearing on the gay  
> marriage debate?

Being an Christian anarchist, I'm thinking he would consider it a  
vice, but no crime and certainly not subject to state laws.  I'll have  
to reread it and see.

regards,
-Lance

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot