>And spending more is realistic?
It's an unfortunate reality. I would love to cut pending across the board in my day to day. I doubt my landlord would appreciate it.
Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen
-----Original Message-----
From: Karl <[email protected]>
To: 'DADL (off topic)' <[email protected]>
Sent: Mon, Nov 8, 2010 3:08 pm
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Reject the Welfare/Warfare State
And spending more is realistic?
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of [email protected]
Sent: Monday, November 08, 2010 12:59 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Reject the Welfare/Warfare State
>But what I wonder is why do you support the party that is advocating more spending?
Because I think the "Cut all spending" is just unrealistic.
Thom
http://thomwade.wordpress.com/
http://www.cafepress.com/Thomwade
http://www.in-one-ear.com
_______________________________________
"I want a song to learn and sing, of a life requited."-Echo & the Bunnymen
--
adl-ot mailing list
ttp://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
ttp://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
--
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not
affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for
the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.