Re: Death penalty
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Please keep in mind the context we have been talking about: home invasion police calls. I have tried to make clear I'm not talking about any or all police call. However I would point out that police are trained to treat *every* response as one that might call for the use of deadly force. So while you may not be thinking of the possibility the officer sure is and it is his job to do so. Mike F. ________________________________ From: Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]> Sent: Wed, November 10, 2010 12:25:54 PM Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Death penalty On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]> wrote: > I thought I answered that in the sentence immediately following the one you > included. I'm not ruling out the possibility that somebody could think that > when calling the police, but I don't think very many do I don't know about the "many". I thought you were specifically questioning a pacifist's decision to call the police. > and I don't think > that is a reasonable or realistic mindset when calling the police. Really? How many police killings are there in your city in a given year? Compare that to the number of calls they go on and what percentage do you have? -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot