Re: The Feminization of the Medal of Honor
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <006a01cb85d2$ae9ef330$0bdcd990$@com> |
To be clear, I knew that, and hope you did not read otherwise. And I too take some exception to his tone. But he is right in a sense, charging a machine gun nest to save your platoon is not the same as dragging a guy away from his captors. But what he (the author) fails to consider is that the real criteria of the MOH has room for both, and I think we are better served by recognizing gallantry in both areas. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pcg Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 1:00 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] The Feminization of the Medal of Honor > **I got to meet several medal of honor recipients. A sobering experience, > particularly when I read about them later. And all the ones I met were much > like this guy, very humble. I've no doubt, and my snarkiness is reserved for the writer of this article, who seems to feel that there is some sort of inherent manliness about killing. -- -pcg [email protected] -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot