Re: Clay Shirky's nuanced position on Wikileaks
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Lance McLain wrote: >> On Monday, as soon as I came home with the kids from preschool, I went >> to the bathroom. When I came out no more than a few minutes later, the >> lights were out and my daughter had already lit a candle on the table >> and put the box of matches back in the cupboard above the kitchen >> counter (she had dragged a chair into the kitchen to get the matches). >> Did I "allow" her to take the matches, light the fire, and so on and so >> forth? > > Well, if the matches are such and important issue to you that you'd > severely punish your daughter even on false charges for playing with > them, then yes, you didn't secure the matches well enough. Whoa, I'm losing track of the analogies here ... > But I feel we are just playing semantic games. Would you like me to > change the word "allow"? How about "failed" or "fault" or > something...better? I don't think it's mere semantics when we're assigning blame. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot