Re: Obama Understands Economics in Spite of Himself

Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Dec 13, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Karl wrote:
> I find it impossible to have a moral argument for any austerity  
> whatsoever for taxpayers until there is austerity for bankers.
> To do so is to condone one of the biggest thefts ever.
>
> **no one os doing any such thing though.  There are legitimate  
> discussion on both issues that need to be had, and refusal to deal  
> with one is not going to help anything on the other.

It is exactly the refusal to deal with the bankster issue that is the  
problem.  (and I don't mean YOU here...I mean everyone)

> **And again, I am not arguing that.  But I think it si a moral  
> fallacy to say “they are thieves, so we can be too…”

Is stealing your own money back that was stolen from you thievery?   
Robin Hood principle applies?

regards,
-Lance

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.