Re: The FCIC falls apart
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
And thats why I say that his selective use of the facts makes the piece too biased to trust. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce Geerdes Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 4:01 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] The FCIC falls apart On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Karl <[email protected]> wrote: > Well if there is a bias then one needs to ask if ALL the facts are > present or just those that support the bias. > > " sticking to discredited Republican talking points" > > That is not totally true, but ok. > > " the long-standing and harmless Community Reinvestment Act" > > Harmless? Really? Oh, I agree with your critiques there. But those seem more like opinions to me, not facts. > As for the vote about the phrases, how many dems voted for or against > it and did it pass in the first place? And was that all the proposal > did or was that an element of it? Sure, that'd be good to know. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot