Re: U.S. Tries to Build Case Against WikiLeaks Founder

>>I ask that finding myself having a very hard time getting worked up about the Wikileaks thing.  If they are trying to build a conspiracy case against Assange that tells me that have no legitimate case against him.  <
**they know that an espionage case will be tough.  Conspiracy is a no brainer.
 

Conspiracy is a bullshit charge.  I know it exists but on a moral level talking about doing something without taking action should be covered by the 1st amendment.  

 

>>And Manning seems like such a small cog in the machine that I have a hard time feeling antagonistic towards him.  

 

**he was the source, wasn’t he?  And what if he had released something really dangerous?  Design of a nuke?  Locations of places Al Qaeda wants to infiltrate.





We hold people responsible for “what if”?  He didn’t release that so we shoudn’t be acting like he did.

 

 

**The first set about Afghanistan revelaed confidential informants in afghanistan and we are still not sure if any of them were endangered.  If even one of them has been harmed, does that change anything?  The state department stuff, I agree it is a different matter, but even then, the potential for harm to us is there.



Maybe I’m funny this way but I think we probably ought to be sure.  

 

 

And I’m really hoping Assange gets around to releasing all the BoA stuff he has.  That said Assange does seem like a real douchebag but that doesn’t mean he can’t be serving a useful purpose. 

 

>**better hoe he expunges your bank account number.<



?  I don’t bank with those aholes .



Mike F. 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot