Re: Forget TRON: Legacy - give me the sequel to Buckaroo Banzai!
"Lance McLain" <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Dec 22, 2010, at 7:06 PM, Johne Cook wrote: > Tron: Legacy > I know that as a geek of long standing I'm supposed to look at the $46 million opening weekend > of this film as a vindication of my lifestyle choices. Some wit online noted that Tron was like > Twilight for nerds, and, God help me, I can't fault that assessment. Darn it...that was exactly my assessment after seeing it last night, I even commented on that to B and the kids. I thought I was being original! Ha! If Twilight is a fantasy for narcissistic teen American princesses who must be center of attention (and I think it is)...then Tron: Legacy is a similar nostaligic fantasy for the geeky guy still reveling in his 1980's teen years. Needless to say, I loved it! :-) I think this film accomplished exactly what it set out to do, and I'm a little more sympathetic to Twilight now as well. I can see why the critics and anyone who thinks too deeply panned this. If you watch this film with the primary intent of looking for flaws you will find them in spades. And yes, on a critical level, I should expect more of film. But at a visceral level, this film had me reliving my glory days, when I thought I could program the world. And while it satiated my need for teen coolness, it also critiqued itself as well (unlike Twilight). It acknowledged the limits of mans ability to create, that there exists creative powers outside of man (with the iso), that the human need for family bonds is more important than getting lost in the technology and we must be on guard against it. Other than that, I don't think you should think too much. Like a teenage boy, just give in to it and revel in the geeky coolness like Napoleon Dynamite would. And Paul, the concerns you expressed about the need for digital world relating to the real world didn't bother me so much. Rather, I saw the digital world being more related to the mind of Flynn (as it was his creation) than the outside world. It related to the outside world only in so much as the outside world related to Flynn's 1980's mind. And the film acknowledges this with reminders that Flynn's only references to the outside world is from the 80's (the WarGames reference, and others). Having no other inputs to the outside world, over time the digital world became more a creation of Flynn (and CLU). My daughter commented that she thought Cora was unnecessary to the plot, but I found her to be the necessary miracle to bring Flynn to the enlightenment that he was not god. Also, she was smoking hot. :-) regards, -Lance (looking for a light up Tron suit on craigslist) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot