Re: oh please.
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Um by quite a few people. Not this guy though,.... https://romanticpoet.wordpress.com/tag/congressman-constitution-not-sacred-docum ent/ http://ethicsalarms.com/2011/01/06/disrespect-for-a-sacred-document/ Here is Dennis Prager's take: http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/256814/nothing-sacred-dennis-prager -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of pcg Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 1:24 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] oh please. > The constitution is regulary referred to a sacred document. Wtf? By who? >You may not like it, but that doesn't mean it isn't a common phrase >and one that most americans understand when it is used. It's not a question of whether anyone likes it, or whether it's common, or even whether anyone understands what she means by it, it's creepy. (Though perfectly in keeping with the scary brand of religio-patriotism that seems to be growing in this country.) -- -pcg [email protected] -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot