Re: oh please.

I'm not supporting her use of anything.  I'm saying that people who are 
criticizing her for it are..........


 



________________________________
From: Johne Cook <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Wed, January 12, 2011 3:45:55 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] oh please.

I think Mike is supporting Sarah's use of 'sacred' in the well known secular 
sense.

Tune in next time to on Words' True Functions (WTF) when Bill Clinton explains 
the definition of what 'is' is.  ; )

Johne Cook
| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |



On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]> wrote:

sa·cred   /ˈseɪkrɪd/  Show Spelled
>[sey-krid]  Show IPA 
>–adjective 
>1. devoted or dedicated to a deity or to some religious purpose; consecrated. 
>2. entitled to veneration or religious respect by association with divinity or 
>divine things; holy. 
>
>3. pertaining to or connected with religion ( opposed to secular or profane): 
>sacred music; sacred books. 
>
>4. reverently dedicated to some person, purpose, or object: a morning hour 
>sacred to study. 
>
>5. regarded with reverence: the sacred memory of a dead hero. 
>6. secured against violation, infringement, etc., as by reverence or sense of 
>right: sacred oaths; sacred rights. 
>
>7. properly immune from violence, interference, etc., as a person or office. 
>
>Only someone who has it in for Palin would be focusing on her referring to the 
>constitution as a sacred document as if it is unusual.  4-7 easily apply to her 
>use of the word.  Give me a break.  
>
>
>Mike F.  
>
>
>
>--
>dadl-ot mailing list
>http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot