Re: oh please.
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Bruce Geerdes wrote: > Except that it's not the document itself they're necessarily worried > about but the rights enshrined (ooh, religious imagery!) in it. What > would you think if we were talking about taking away rights that you > hold dear? You mean, like, through an Amendment that took away slave-owners' rights? Or an Amendment that took away the right to drink? Or an amendment that contradicted the previous Amendment and gave that right back? Etc. > I mean, read the founding fathers of this country and all their talk > about tyrants and "blood of patriots". This stuff is our history, not > something people are making up on the fly. Whoa, you're starting to sound like a right-winger, there, Bruce! ;) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot