Re: oh please.
Bruce Geerdes <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 4:18 PM, Peter T. Chattaway < petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> wrote: > Except that it's not the document itself they're necessarily worried about >> but the rights enshrined (ooh, religious imagery!) in it. What would you >> think if we were talking about taking away rights that you hold dear? >> > > You mean, like, through an Amendment No, since the system of Amendments is also defined in the Constitution, they're sacred too. ;) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot