Re: oh please.
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wed, 12 Jan 2011, Karl wrote: > > When people say you've contributed to a culture of rudeness, I don't > > think "Fuck you" is necessarily the best reply. At least not if > > you're going to claim the high ground, as she seems to do in the rest > > of the video. > > If she had actually said that I would agree. My point is that she said that *in effect* by continuing to use loaded rhetoric at a time when her rhetoric is coming under closer scrutiny. > When falsely accused, the person accused has a right to refute it. Yes, but not in a way that self-incriminates. When the accusation is that she uses loaded rhetoric, it would be helpful to her cause if her reply did not contain any loaded rhetoric. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot