Re: Is Palin's blood libel sacred? was oh please
pcg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > You can't tell me that people *aren't* arguing > > over Palin's words. [...] > > **sorry, that is pointless. People were making > accusations on things she said months ago. > Then they were arguing over her saying nothing. > Then when she did, they said she was a coward > hiding behind her facebook. So she comes out and > directly refutes it and she is a bitch for being > confrontational. The fact is pretty obvious that her > haters will find any reason they can. I'm trying to root out the logic behind this argument. It would *appear* you're saying that because some groups will attack Palin regardless of what she does, any legitimate criticism of her is invalid. I can't imagine you'd cop to that explanation, so could you please explain what you're getting at with this line of reasoning? -- -pcg [email protected] -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot