Re: Is Palin's blood libel sacred? was oh please
pcg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I didn’t say that. That's why I said it *appears* to be what you're saying, and asked for clarification. > Peter commented that people are arguing over her words. > > I am just pointing out that as point of interest it is unremarkable give their > history of attacking anything she does. Well, no, you *didn't* just point it out as unremarkable. You explicitly said Peter's statement was "pointless." And I see now that you either didn't mean what you wrote, or can't justify what it entails. With an position that amorphous, I can't help but wonder why you'd argue the point in the first place. -- -pcg [email protected] -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot