Re: just checking...
Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > I don't accept your premise that it was insensitive language. >t's not a premise, it's a fact, established by all the people who were sensitive >to it in a way that Palin presumably didn't intend.< Says you. I've presented two examples of high profile jews, well versed in this issue, one conservative and the other liberal, neither of which are fans of Palins who say you are wrong. If it is to be a battle of experts I'll take my experts. > The people who claim that they are offended by the blood libel thing are the >same ones who blame her for inciting the shooter - why do you find them >credible? >What does "credibility" have to do with this?< Was it Brer Rabbit being credible when he begged Mister Fox, (I think it was Mister Fox), to throw him into the brier patch? I'm not sure how to explain it any better than that if you don't agree that the credibility of one making claims goes to the veracity of the claims. Mike F. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot