Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)

Mike Findlay <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Using that logic it is wrong for Muslims to refer to the Koran as sacred?  

For me, I'm really uncomfortable with the imposing of religion, or forcing uber 
religious meaning onto words that have a very recognizable and understandable 
non religious meaning.


Mike F.  




________________________________
From: Johne Cook <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Thu, January 13, 2011 5:15:30 PM
Subject: [DADL-OT] Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)

I know of precisely one sacred document, the Bible. Unless you can show me 
something that indicates that the dove of the spirit descended from heaven and 
came to rest on America's most esteemed documents or something, I feel 
comfortable asserting that regardless of the hushed and reverent tones people 
have for our respected national documents, they are as valuable as can be but 
not 'sacred.'

Johne Cook
| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |



On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Karl <[email protected]> wrote:

I just do not see how feeling the constitution is a sacred document means you: 
> 
>“elevate patriotism (love of country) over love of God”
> 
>That has not been demonstrated anywhere.
> 
>Marriage is a sacred vow, does that mean I revere marriage over God? 
> 
>Karl
> 
>From:[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>Johne Cook
>Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 2:43 PM
>To: DADL (off topic)
>Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] just checking...
> 
>Paul's not the only one to wonder about the use of the word 'sacred' as a 
>stand-in for 'secular reverence'. The two are related but distinct concepts. 
>Peter seems to question Palin's use of the word, as do I. 
>
>
>I relate it to taking patriotism too far. It is well and good to be proud of 
>where you were born and live, however, if you are a Christian, it is wrong to 
>elevate patriotism (love of country) over love of God. Patriotism can turn into 
>worship of country if we are not careful, and I know many are not careful about 
>this. As a football fan, I see the same lack of mental clarity when it comes to 
>one's fondness for one's team. I really enjoy the Green Bay Packers, and in WI, 
>being a Packers fan is essentially a religion. That's where simple fondness 
>crosses the line and becomes something misguided and wrong. 
>
>
>Johne Cook
>| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |
>
>
>On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]> wrote:
>I don't accept your premise that it was insensitive language.  Further the 
>analogy is severely flawed - the mosque hasn't been built, but the speech has 
>already been given.  It would be one thing if Palin shopped the speech around 
>and received a significant amount of *legitimate* feedback saying the term blood 
>libel, (sorry, the sacred thing is apparently your personal bugaboo so I'm not 
>bothering with that), was insensitive the analogy might work.
> 
>The people who claim that they are offended by the blood libel thing are the 
>same ones who blame her for inciting the shooter -  why do you find them 
>credible?
> 
>Mike F.  
> 
>
________________________________

>From:Peter T. Chattaway <[email protected]>
>To: Daniel Amos off-topic listserver <[email protected]>
>Sent: Thu, January 13, 2011 4:10:07 PM
>Subject: [DADL-OT] just checking...
>
>So while we're on the topic of loaded rhetoric and the insensitive use of 
>symbolic language etc., I was wondering:  Does everyone who defends Palin's use 
>of this language (which struck many as the wrong thing in the wrong place at the 
>wrong time) also defend the "Ground Zero mosque" (which struck many as the wrong 
>thing in the wrong place at the wrong time)?
>
>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/12/sarah-palin-refudiates-sa_n_808213.html

>
>-- dadl-ot mailing list
>http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>
>--
>dadl-ot mailing list
>http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
> 
>--
>dadl-ot mailing list
>http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.