Re: just checking...
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
It sent without it. I think that the fact so many people are so fired up to jump on anything she says is part of the problem. Since they keep elevating her to the headlines, are the liberals to blame as much as her? If she is inciting them intentionally (and no I dont think she did that this time) why not criticize them for falling for it? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter T. Chattaway Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 4:37 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] just checking... On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Karl wrote: >>> **And what is interesting is how you criticize her for inciting >>> debate. >> >> Uh, no, I did not do that. I said she *contributed* to it by >> responding to charges of loaded rhetoric with loaded rhetoric. > > **Ok, for a moment I will accept that. Answer my question. There's a question? -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot