Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)

"Karl" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Not at all.  I actually wondered when you would catch on.  I chose my words very
carefully.

It proves my point that language evolves, and that often people use it in
personal ways, and that only be keeping things in the right context can you
understand.

And in that light, you have to put your own preconceptions on the back plate for
a minute and actually try to understand.

Or you can ignore that, provide your own context because you really do not care
about truth, and you can be judgmental, and assume.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Peter T. Chattaway
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 5:22 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)

On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Karl wrote:
> Nope.  I dont worship it all.
> Try again.

Well gosh, for a guy who thinks secondary and tertiary definitions can trump
primary definitions, you sure do seem to insist on the primary one
here:

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worship?show=1&t=1294967999

    2 : to regard with great or extravagant respect, honor, or devotion <a
celebrity worshipped by her fans>

That, my friends, is the sound of Karl being *BUSTED*!



-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.