Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Not at all. I actually wondered when you would catch on. I chose my words very carefully. It proves my point that language evolves, and that often people use it in personal ways, and that only be keeping things in the right context can you understand. And in that light, you have to put your own preconceptions on the back plate for a minute and actually try to understand. Or you can ignore that, provide your own context because you really do not care about truth, and you can be judgmental, and assume. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter T. Chattaway Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 5:22 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...) On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Karl wrote: > Nope. I dont worship it all. > Try again. Well gosh, for a guy who thinks secondary and tertiary definitions can trump primary definitions, you sure do seem to insist on the primary one here: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/worship?show=1&t=1294967999 2 : to regard with great or extravagant respect, honor, or devotion <a celebrity worshipped by her fans> That, my friends, is the sound of Karl being *BUSTED*! -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot