Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <7F1EE5B5DD124605B6A05765F401B645@MikePC> |
What is the sound of one hand clapping? Really, Peter, are you suggesting that the only proper usage of words is with their primary definition? You are in a very small minority, as it would seem to me that the inclusion of alternate definitions itself is evidence that you don't have a linguistic leg to stand on. Mike F. -----Original Message----- From: Peter T. Chattaway Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 6:31 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...) On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Karl wrote: > **which bible? The catholic> Protestant? The KJV or the NAS or the NIV? > The OT or the NT? Well, obviously, they are *all* sacred to the religions that regard them as such. > **I really enjoy that you refuse to accept the alternate definitions too. I don't refuse to accept them, I just keep them in their place. At the kids' table, if you will. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot