Re: Palin's secret message

And I'll bet you not more than 1 in 10 evangelicals know the history of "blood 
libel" so to say that is "dog whistle" to her base is a canard, (correct 
spelling and all).  


Mike F.  



________________________________
From: Johne Cook <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 3:57:36 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Palin's secret message

It amuses me when the Left cannot decide whether members of the Right are so 
shrewd and calculating and guilty of shadowy machination or bumbling fools. Or 
both. Or either, depending on the day. 


(This link culled from yours.)
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0111/47558.html


On MSNBC, liberal commentator Ed Schultz also raised the idea that Palin’s use 
of “blood libel” was intentional, countering suggestions that she was unaware of 
what the term meant. 


(I get the impression she is calculating but not shrewd, a touch naive but not 
exactly bumbling. I think she knew what she intended to convey, but it didn't 
turn out as she expected. And to Lee Martinez' credit, she never seems to 
apologize for anything.

Johne Cook
| http://raygunrevival.com | http://authorculture.blogspot.com |



On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:40 PM, Mike Findlay <[email protected]> wrote:

http://www.imao.us/index.php/2011/01/what-secret-coded-message-did-palin-send-out/

>
>
>
>
>
>--
>dadl-ot mailing list
>http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot