Re: Well done Lance

I do.  I heard he specifically threatened 47 people.  If any of the threats had
any sense of menace, he likely deserves what he got.
 
 
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mike Findlay
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:38 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
 
I'll be honest that I haven't read it but I got the sense that these were only
written or verbal threats.  Being the free speech absolutist that I am that
shouldn't be enough to get arrested.  Speech without action shouldn't be a
crime.  Hmmm I suppose in some circumstances like bribery or blackmail implied
action is enough.  But I think you know what I mean.  
 
Mike F. 
 
  _____  

From: Karl <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 4:30:30 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
And were any of them bad enough to justify this?
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Lance McLain
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:27 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
 
The scribed document embedded in the link I posted has the complaint with
alledged threats.

Sent from my iPhone

On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:13 PM, "Karl" <[email protected]> wrote:
From the reports I have heard he went way past free speech, though I am stil
trying to track down his exact comments.
 
 
 
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Mike Findlay
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 12:56 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
 
So much for free speech.  
 
Mike F. 
 

  _____  

From: Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 2:43:16 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance


On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Lance McLain wrote:



 
On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Mike Findlay wrote:



For me there is no debate about what scumbags the bankers are and the level of
evil they have perpetuated on this country.  
 
Yes. If (and that's a big if) there is ever a need for uncivil discourse and
violence...it should be directed there, IMO. I mean, how many times will you
allow a thief to break into your home and steal from you before you buy a
shotgun and wait for him?  
 
I guess I had better be more careful with my rhetoric.
 
http://www.zerohedge.com/article/vincent-mccrudden-ceo-alnbri-management-arreste
d-threatening-kill-members-sec-finra-and-cftc?utm_source=feedburner
<http://www.zerohedge.com/article/vincent-mccrudden-ceo-alnbri-management-arrest
ed-threatening-kill-members-sec-finra-and-cftc?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=
feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+time
line%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>
&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long
+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29
 
regards,
-Lance
 
 
-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot