Re: Obama takes opportunity Palin missed
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > > And there were better ways to respond and worse ways to respond. Not > > all responses are equal. That's the point here. > > But I've said that myself. You have? Seems to me you and Karl have largely adopted an "anything she said would have been attacked so it didn't matter what she said" stance here. (It's kind of like saying "we're all going to die no matter what, so it doesn't matter how we live", isn't it?) > We were talking about the use of sacred and blood libel and whether she > was "wrong" to use either of those. Yes, the "blood libel" bit in particular would fall under the category of "worse way" rather than "better way". -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot