Re: Palin's secret message
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Mike Findlay wrote: > I'd swear under oath that the Passion of the Christ arguments never > mentioned the term blood libel in a substantive way. Maybe the movie > was labelled a blood libel but the argument wasn't about the > offensiveness/lack of offensiveness of the term. Uh, well, we had literally over a hundred posts in a thread on "Gibson's Blood Libel", but in any case: yes, the debate back then was not about *the term*, it was about *the blood libel itself*. It is, in fact, because of that debate that I knew what the term meant now. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot