Re: Well done Lance

I just read the FBI complaint.  There was a lot of stuff in there I  
wouldn't consider criminal on its own. However, he did post on his  
website a 100k reward for verified "Punishment" of officials.
I think this was just a CYA complaint in case he did something  
violent, at least there would be record of it.

regards,
-Lance


On Jan 14, 2011, at 6:38 PM, Lance McLain wrote:

> It is noteworthy that we are seeing more and more violence against  
> gov't agencies and people.  Let's not forget that not too long ago  
> that guy flew an airplane into the IRS building in Austin.
>
> regards,
> -Lance
>
> On Jan 14, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Karl wrote:
>
>> I don’t totally disagree really.  I am a huge free speech advocate,  
>> but that said, I do draw the line at actual threats.  I guess I  
>> will have to parse the court docs and see.
>>
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:dadl-ot- 
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Findlay
>> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:49 PM
>> To: DADL (off topic)
>> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
>>
>> What the heck is a sense of menace?  Does it come with a grrrrrr?   
>> Or is it typed in all caps?
>>
>> If he took actions that made a reasonable person fear an imminent  
>> assault then he should most definitely should be held to account,  
>> but barring that I don't see what he could have *said* that  
>> deserved criminal charges.
>>
>> He could be sued civilly for intentional infliction of emotional  
>> distress and I don't have a problem with that.  But I don't like  
>> throwing the enormous weight and power of the federal govt. behind  
>> offensive speech.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: Karl <[email protected]>
>> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 4:40:37 PM
>> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
>>
>> I do.  I heard he specifically threatened 47 people.  If any of the  
>> threats had any sense of menace, he likely deserves what he got.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:dadl-ot- 
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Findlay
>> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:38 PM
>> To: DADL (off topic)
>> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
>>
>> I'll be honest that I haven't read it but I got the sense that  
>> these were only written or verbal threats.  Being the free speech  
>> absolutist that I am that shouldn't be enough to get arrested.   
>> Speech without action shouldn't be a crime.  Hmmm I suppose in some  
>> circumstances like bribery or blackmail implied action is enough.   
>> But I think you know what I mean.
>>
>> Mike F.
>>
>> From: Karl <[email protected]>
>> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 4:30:30 PM
>> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
>>
>> And were any of them bad enough to justify this?
>>
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:dadl-ot- 
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Lance McLain
>> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:27 PM
>> To: DADL (off topic)
>> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
>>
>> The scribed document embedded in the link I posted has the  
>> complaint with alledged threats.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:13 PM, "Karl" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> From the reports I have heard he went way past free speech, though  
>> I am stil trying to track down his exact comments.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: [email protected] [mailto:dadl-ot- 
>> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Findlay
>> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 12:56 PM
>> To: DADL (off topic)
>> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
>>
>> So much for free speech.
>>
>> Mike F.
>>
>> From: Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
>> To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 2:43:16 PM
>> Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Lance McLain wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Mike Findlay wrote:
>>
>>
>> For me there is no debate about what scumbags the bankers are and  
>> the level of evil they have perpetuated on this country.
>>
>> Yes. If (and that's a big if) there is ever a need for uncivil  
>> discourse and violence...it should be directed there, IMO. I mean,  
>> how many times will you allow a thief to break into your home and  
>> steal from you before you buy a shotgun and wait for him?
>>
>> I guess I had better be more careful with my rhetoric.
>>
>> http://www.zerohedge.com/article/vincent-mccrudden-ceo-alnbri-management-arrested-threatening-kill-members-sec-finra-and-cftc?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29
>>
>> regards,
>> -Lance
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> dadl-ot mailing list
>> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>> -- 
>> dadl-ot mailing list
>> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
>> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
>
> -- 
> dadl-ot mailing list
> http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot