Re: Well done Lance

On Jan 15, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Mike Findlay wrote:

> Ah the age old question.  That should be governed by civil liability  
> not criminal.

ooh..that's interesting.  Never thought of it that way.

> I realized there will always be a continuum of speech to action that  
> must be defined, (bribery, blackmail, hits for hire as in this  
> example -  I question how serious that was as opposed to just  
> frustrated venting), but the line should be drawn in a way that  
> allows the most speech possible.

I agree.

regards,
-Lance

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot