Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)
pcg <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Uh, you don't see any distinction between the function of political speech and rock music lyrics? (I assume you're being facetious.) I dunno how many different ways to say it. I'd never noticed anyone referring to government documents as sacred things. If it had been Obama or *anyone* else, I wouldve been just as taken aback. And, yeah, as a writer, I *do* care about the currency of language. Still not sure where to come down on the whole thing, though. On 1/15/11, Mike Findlay <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm listening to Bruce Springsteen's 10th Avenue Freezeout from the Live > From Madison Square Garden. > > Man I'd hate to hear what you religious terminology fanatics would say about > this one. He wants to hold a rock n roll exorcism, a rock n roll baptism > and a rock n roll barmitzvah; he wants to go the river of faith; the river > of life, etc all in a rock n roll setting. He is explicitly coopting > spiritual/religious language for rock n roll purposes. > > I'm more convinced than ever that you guys are really over stepping in your > criticism of Palin for referring to the constitution as sacred. You are > entitled to your opinion but it doesn't reflect reality. > > Mike F. > > > -- > dadl-ot mailing list > http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot > -- -pcg [email protected] -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot