Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)
"Mike Findlay" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <ED2743F6FD6F411DB1FBB5B87C9BCDC3@MikePC> |
>Uh, you don't see any distinction between the function of political speech and rock music lyrics? (I assume you're being facetious.)< In that they both use words, no. Obviously they are about different things, but if sacred is such , dare I say, sacred word its supposed coopting should offend no matter who does it or why it is done. And again my point was that, even if on some hyper technical, uber religious level, (I'm not granting that), you are correct, you are so far out of the mainstream function of language as communication that it comes across as tilting at windmills. Yeah sometimes sometimes tilting at windmills is heroic, but in this instance it just looks foolish. Mike F. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot