Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)
"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Karl Swenson wrote: >> The Constitution says nothing about sentiments. > > **no but it does offer limits on religion. Well, that's not the point here, is it? > **my answer supplied the context. If her remark was not meant religious > then she is not promoting religious sentiments to the constitution. Actually, you're wrong about that. You can religious sentiments even if there is no specific religious institution attached to them. (Though in the case of Mormons, at least, an institution does exist.) -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot