Re: Sacred tangent (was Re: just checking...)

"Peter T. Chattaway" <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Karl Swenson wrote:

>> The Constitution says nothing about sentiments.
>
> **no but it does offer limits on religion.

Well, that's not the point here, is it?

> **my answer supplied the context.  If her remark was not meant religious 
> then she is not promoting religious sentiments to the constitution.

Actually, you're wrong about that.  You can religious sentiments even if 
there is no specific religious institution attached to them.  (Though in 
the case of Mormons, at least, an institution does exist.)

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.