Re: Well done Lance

I think they were suggesting that if he is an enemy of America he is subject
to the rules of war where you can indeed be shot.  And its an idiotic and
irresponsible thought in opinion.

 

Of course whether he deserves to be caught and tired, that's another issue.

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Lance McLain
Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 8:31 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance

 

So, wasn't there a politician theatening Julian Assange recently.  Saying he
should be assasinated or hunted down like a terrorist or something.  

That sounds kind of menacing.

 

regards,

-Lance

 

 

On Jan 14, 2011, at 4:56 PM, Karl wrote:





I don't totally disagree really.  I am a huge free speech advocate, but that
said, I do draw the line at actual threats.  I guess I will have to parse
the court docs and see.

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mike Findlay
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:49 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance

 

What the heck is a sense of menace?  Does it come with a grrrrrr?  Or is it
typed in all caps? 

 

If he took actions that made a reasonable person fear an imminent assault
then he should most definitely should be held to account, but barring that I
don't see what he could have *said* that deserved criminal charges.

 

He could be sued civilly for intentional infliction of emotional distress
and I don't have a problem with that.  But I don't like throwing the
enormous weight and power of the federal govt. behind offensive speech.

 


 

 

  _____  

From: Karl <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 4:40:37 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance

I do.  I heard he specifically threatened 47 people.  If any of the threats
had any sense of menace, he likely deserves what he got.

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mike Findlay
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:38 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance

 

I'll be honest that I haven't read it but I got the sense that these were
only written or verbal threats.  Being the free speech absolutist that I am
that shouldn't be enough to get arrested.  Speech without action shouldn't
be a crime.  Hmmm I suppose in some circumstances like bribery or blackmail
implied action is enough.  But I think you know what I mean. 

 

Mike F.

 

  _____  

From: Karl <[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 4:30:30 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance

And were any of them bad enough to justify this?

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Lance McLain
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 2:27 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance

 

The scribed document embedded in the link I posted has the complaint with
alledged threats.


Sent from my iPhone


On Jan 14, 2011, at 3:13 PM, "Karl" <[email protected]> wrote:

From the reports I have heard he went way past free speech, though I am stil
trying to track down his exact comments.

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Mike Findlay
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 12:56 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance

 

So much for free speech. 

 

Mike F.

 


  _____  


From: Lance McLain <lance-X3DuywwxauBWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
To: DADL (off topic) <[email protected]>
Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 2:43:16 PM
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Well done Lance

On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:47 AM, Lance McLain wrote:

 

 

On Jan 14, 2011, at 9:24 AM, Mike Findlay wrote:

 

For me there is no debate about what scumbags the bankers are and the level
of evil they have perpetuated on this country. 

 

Yes. If (and that's a big if) there is ever a need for uncivil discourse and
violence...it should be directed there, IMO. I mean, how many times will you
allow a thief to break into your home and steal from you before you buy a
shotgun and wait for him?  

 

I guess I had better be more careful with my rhetoric.

 

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/vincent-mccrudden-ceo-alnbri-management-arr
ested-threatening-kill-members-sec-finra-and-cftc?utm_source=feedburner
<http://www.zerohedge.com/article/vincent-mccrudden-ceo-alnbri-management-ar
rested-threatening-kill-members-sec-finra-and-cftc?utm_source=feedburner&utm
_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long
+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29>
&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+
long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29

 

regards,

-Lance

 

 

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot