Re: the Oscars (was: Nazi sympathies soft-pedaled in The King's Speech?)
"Karl" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Huh? Who said I could have or that I even think it needs improving? It just did not seem to be anything that made anyone go wow, so I wondered why. From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce Geerdes Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:25 AM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] the Oscars (was: Nazi sympathies soft-pedaled in The King's Speech?) On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:23 AM, Peter T. Chattaway <petert-LOVM4QxV+tDq6eQxt3vRmLDks+cytr/[email protected]> wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2011, Karl wrote: Can you be a little more specific? The Zeitgeist thing I get, though I am not sure that should be an Oscar qualification, but the craftsmanship, what are you referring to. Well, it's well-written, well-shot, well-acted, well-edited, well-scored, etc. It's a very good example of good filmmaking, and the Oscars are handed out by filmmakers, so... Karl, I'm curious how you would've improved it? -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot