Re: Canada gets first, bitter dose of metered Internet

"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.music.dadl.ot
Message-ID <009b01cbc279$da7a4a70$8f6edf50$@com>
This article offers some interesting points.

 

It also shows how long this debate has been churning.

 

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/18/AR2007011801
508.html

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
Behalf Of Bruce Geerdes
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 3:47 PM
To: DADL (off topic)
Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Canada gets first, bitter dose of metered Internet

 

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Karl Swenson <[email protected]> wrote:

Are you assuming that you will be billed only for access, and Netflix will
be free?

 

I don't follow.

 

To answer though, I hate the thought of any kind of consumer bandwith
charge.  I made sense when the infrastructure was struggling, but not any
more.

 

Net neutrality doesn't speak to whether we'll have metered billing or not.
But it says that if we *do* have metered billing, ISPs can't single out
sources like Netflix or Youtube for better or worse pricing.

-- 
dadl-ot mailing list
http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us
http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.