Re: Canada gets first, bitter dose of metered Internet
"Karl Swenson" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.music.dadl.ot |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <009b01cbc279$da7a4a70$8f6edf50$@com> |
This article offers some interesting points. It also shows how long this debate has been churning. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/18/AR2007011801 508.html From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Bruce Geerdes Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2011 3:47 PM To: DADL (off topic) Subject: Re: [DADL-OT] Canada gets first, bitter dose of metered Internet On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 4:40 PM, Karl Swenson <[email protected]> wrote: Are you assuming that you will be billed only for access, and Netflix will be free? I don't follow. To answer though, I hate the thought of any kind of consumer bandwith charge. I made sense when the infrastructure was struggling, but not any more. Net neutrality doesn't speak to whether we'll have metered billing or not. But it says that if we *do* have metered billing, ISPs can't single out sources like Netflix or Youtube for better or worse pricing. -- dadl-ot mailing list http://mail.thehood.us/mailman/listinfo/dadl-ot_thehood.us http://news.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot